Category Archives: Politics

Mr Paice receives a battering – but dairy farmers line up bigger targets in August

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Wednesday’s unprecedented coming together of dairy farmers in London was notable on a number of levels.

The sheer volume of farmers and supporters from the allied industries – nearly 3,000 united in anger and a desire to force real change – crammed into Westminster’s imposing Methodist Central Hall made for an electric atmosphere.

There was the coming together of UK farming organisations and with simple, clear messages. Enough is enough. Farmers are here in their masses because they can take no more. ‘We’ – all of us – will be out in force in protest August, unless things change rapidly.

And then there was the car crash that was Farming Minister Jim Paice’s appearance.

Over the years, Labour Ministers routinely received a (metaphorical) battering at the hands of angry farmers. But Mr Paice, a farmer by background and at heart, has grown used to being the farmer’s friend during his years in Opposition and – for the most part – in Government.

Which is why Wednesday must have felt like a hammer blow for the Minister, who has just suffered his worst week in office.

The event had begun in barnstorming fashion. NFU deputy president Meurig Raymond, standing for Peter Kendall, stranded at a French airport, earned a raucous ovation for a passionately delivered speech ending with the call to ‘back our dairy farmers’.

Farmers For Action’s David Handley, the ultimate crowd-pleaser – farming’s Mick Jagger but without the wrinkles – topped it with a speech of raw passion, aggression and humour ending with a call to action. ‘Cancel your holidays in August,’ he pleaded. No excuses. Everyone knew what he meant.

Mr Paice started on the back foot when his turn came. He was greeted with a mixture boos and applause. “I don’t mind being booed but wait until I have finished something,” he responded, little realising how his words would come to haunt him.

He had already had a bad day in Tuesday, after admitting in a radio interview that he didn’t know the price of a pint of milk, as ‘my wife does the shopping’, a gaffe had generated glee and ridicule.

But he handled the situation superbly, holding up a pint of milk ‘I know that this costs, 49p’, followed by a bottle of water, ‘I also know that THIS cost, 53p. I know which is better value-for-money. I know which cost far more to produce. I know which is more nutritious and which is more important to the UK economy.”

Big applause. Back on track.

And he continued to make a decent enough impression, empathising with farmers, criticising the failings of the supply chain and outlining what the Government was doing to help, including new helpful announcements on nitrate regulations and progress on a voluntary code of practice to bring about a fairer deal for farmers. He sought to stress the limits of what politicians can do. “Governments can’t fix prices,” he said.

Fair enough. But then it all went wrong.

“And it involves all of you, too.” Silence. “Are you sure you are doing all you can do reduce your production costs?” Angry murmur from audience, rapidly turning into loud boos. Some heckled loudly.

Mr Paice stopped in his tracks, the surprise etched over his face captured in our video round up of the event. “You see how easy it is to lose friends,” he said. Nobody laughed.

From that moment, the mood of the entire event had turned.

It became a cycle of farmers standing up to berate Mr Paice, rather than the processors and supermarkets that are paying them so little, and the Minister trying, in vain, to dig himself out of the hole. The rest of the panel of industry leaders was effectively bypassed.

As the heckling grew louder, Mr Paice initially tried to meet fire with fire. “If you think shouting me down is going to help you, forget it.”

He asked farmers why they had allowed themselves to be pushed around by the rest of the food chain, a reference to the lack of collaboration among UK dairy farmers. The farmers did not like it one little bit.

“I used to think Jim Paice was quiet sensible, until I heard him today,” came a barb from Cornwall.

“How do you want to be remembered Mr Paice? As the doctor who put things right or the undertaker?” asked another from the floor.

There were many more like it.

As his mood visibly darkened, Mr Paice told the audience he was the best friend they had in Parliament. The irony is, he was probably right.

And then came the killer blow as a member of the audience – I didn’t catch her name – accused Mr Paice of ‘patronising farmers’, the very farmers who so readily vote Conservative.

Mr Paice finally stepped back, apologising if he had offended or patronised them and insisting that had not been his intention.

But it was too late. He had lost his audience.

His misjudgement was not to question whether farmers, themselves – along with processors, supermarkets, law makers and trade organisations – could do more to help themselves.

It was to do it in that way, in that venue and in front of that audience. A battered audience on the edge and on its knees. An audience that didn’t want friends, advice or rhetoric. They wanted help and more money for their milk.

It was never going to be easy but Mr Paice did not need to make it so hard. He is a strong politician and will recover to fight better days.

The real pity was that the battle of ‘One Minister versus 3,000 dairy farmers’ ultimately deflated some – but by no means all – of the hugely positive energy generated by the event.

But the direction has been set and that is all likely to change in the next few weeks as the industry sets aside August in this wet, miserable Olympic summer to target – with one voice and one goal – the real source of their fury.

As Dave Handley said afterwards: “There’s an awful lot of people in the retail and processing industry who should be very, very worried.”

UK must fight hard on CAP reform

The UK is historically perceived as being on the periphery of EU negotiations on key issues like the euro, the budget or the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

Despite Caroline Spelman’s insistence that the coalition Government is determined to embark on the next round of CAP reform in a spirit of ‘positive relationships’ with EU partners, her comments this week suggested the same old story may be about to unfold.

Her clearly stated desire to push for a substantial shift of funds away from direct payments and towards pillar 2 rural development policies seems to put her odds with other member states and Brussels.

Continue reading

Spending cuts will test Defra to its limit

Farmers and civil servants are not natural bedfellows.

Ask anyone who has been on the receiving end of an RPA inspection or who has been subject to an Environment Agency investigation.

For many, the very mention of bureaucracy and inspections is enough to bring on a feeling of impending doom. So, is it any wonder that the story most commented on this week at www.farmersguardian.com is headlined Defra spending cuts will be bloody.

There were precious few people on our website willing to stick up for Defra, and even fewer who were positive about Natural England and the Environment Agency.

Continue reading

Defra’s £700 million question

Last Wednesday at a press conference Defra Secretary Caroline Spelman was asked how her department would save £700 million over the next four years. She got to £316 million before running out of answers. The worrying thing is she either doesn’t know where the rest of the savings will come from or she doesn’t want to tell us.

Ominous either way.

£700 million is equivalent to a 29 per cent cut in her department’s spending and it was the figure outlined by Chancellor George Osborne in his Comprehensive Spending Review to help Britain reduce its crippling debt.

Mrs Spelman announced the following savings to our huddle of eager journalists:

  • £66 million in rural development money
  • £61 million in flood defence spend
  • £174 million by reducing staff numbers and making administration efficiencies
  • She cobbled together a further £3 million saving by stopping 7 waste PFI projects and £12 million by reforming the Environment Agency’s staff lease car scheme (whatever that is)

That is a total saving of £316 million over the next four years.

But despite repeated questioning from the bemused hacks she failed to divulge where the remaining £384 million savings would come from. 

Nobody denies the need to make savings but farmers want more answers on where. Will it be found down the back of a Defra sofa?

Continue reading

The day of a thousand cuts dawns

MoneyIT IS the day reality bites – for the Coalition Government and its public.

The pre-election debate, between Labour and Tories in particular, was defined by the age old left-right debate how to drag yourself out of recession – spend or cut.

The Tories, with a little help from their Lib Dem friends, won and today – October 20, 2010 – is the long promised day of reckoning. The day that will change people’s lives and, even at this very early stage, could define how long David Cameron stays in power.

The Comprehensive Spending Review, set to be unveiled at 12.30 today, is as the NFU’s Martin Haworth said yesterday going to be ‘bloody’, with the aftershock felt across Government and society.

Continue reading

The Defra honeymoon continues…but for how long?

Defra is still honeymooning, walking in a farmer wonderland. But how long will it last?

At last year’s Conservative Party conference Jim Paice, the then shadow farming minister, said if he got into Government he would to cut red-tape, tackle badgers, ditch unhelpful quangos and put British farming back on the Government agenda.

Eyes in the audience lit up, but the farmer next to me had a four word riposte, and while I can’t repeat the first word, the second three went: “Talk is cheap.”

Now Jim Paice is the Farming Minister he has a lot to deliver on, and he knows it more than anyone.

“We were out of power so long I got to make a lot of promises over the years,” said a rueful Mr Paice when he addressed the NFU fringe event at this year’s party conference in Birmingham.

But the positive atmosphere from a packed audience of over 100 people at the fringe event (admittedly mostly party faithful but also many farmers and industry representatives) was a good signal that Mr Paice has made rapid progress in a short space of time in power.

Continue reading

Ed Miliband is a bit of a joker, but is he serious about farmers?

What can farmers expect from the new Labour leader Ed Miliband?

Bad jokes?

Yes. When Ed told the one to conference delegates about ‘David being so left wing as a child he nationalised my train set’ I was closer to crying than laughing.

I did however notice one young labour supporter, clearly planted in the audience, who nearly fell off his chair with glee. The supporter got shinier and more enthusiastic as the Ed-athon continued.  

And as the jokes got worse (‘Jack Straw was around when the wheel was invented’) I admit I found them funnier and warmed to the shiny supporter too. 

Continue reading

Putting the ‘F’ into the General Election

THE Tories want to put the ‘F’ back into Defra. It was, after all, the present government that took it out in a highly symbolic gesture in 2001. Actually, it was the letter ‘A’ but the effect was the same.

In a post-election departmental revamp, Tony Blair replaced the disgraced Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Maff), with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). ‘Agriculture’ out, ‘Environment’ in.

The NFU had to fight hard to even get the word ‘food’ onto the Nobel House nameplate, it is said. MAFF, long seen as an agent of the industry, had paid the price for the foot-and-mouth disease calamity.

Defra arrived with a new agenda. It placed the environment at heart of all it controlled, including food and farming policy – all-too-often, farmers maintained, at the expense of their ability to produce food.

The Conservatives pledge to put ‘Farming’ or ‘Agriculture’ back on the Nobel House nameplate, if elected on May 6, is a neat ploy to state their farming credentials against this backdrop.

Continue reading